Skip to content
Modern British News

Might Additional Nations Pursue Australia's Lead in Prohibiting Social Media for Youth Under Sixteen?

Australia's controversial policy to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and families are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing number of states are exploring comparable measures.

  • Denmark has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our children's innocence". Legislation is expected to be passed next year.
  • Norway is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
  • Ireland is working on a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "an tools in reserve".
  • In Spain, the leader has asked the legislature to pass a proposal raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
  • In France, the president has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
  • The government in the Netherlands has urged parents to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory resolution supporting a ban for minors unless parental consent is granted. Although it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the step does not enact binding law.

"A strong age limit is a solid starting point," commented a leading European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a possible ban, stating that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any action must be "based on robust evidence".

Last year, support built behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the government committed to investigate the matter.

Charities have expressed concerns. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a girl who was lost after being exposed to disturbing social media material suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are safe and suitable for children," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, regulation is largely occurring at the local level due to national stalemate.

  • Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
  • Florida has signed a law barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
  • Virginia has enacted a regulation capping minors to one hour of social media use per day, with additional use needing a guardian's okay.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills requiring adult authorization for minors to create social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from various politicians to follow this lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Views

Apart from the West, further countries are likewise taking action.

  • Malaysia aims to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
  • Brazil has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, world organizations strike a more measured tone. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even have unintended consequences". The body notes that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide discussion evolves, the actions of this nation and others indicate that policymakers around the world are increasingly willing to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.

The writer

Christina Carter

A seasoned journalist with over a decade of experience covering British politics and social trends, Evelyn brings a sharp analytical perspective to modern UK affairs.

Modern British News

Type to search articles.